EJM Designs Limited Blog
Showing posts with label search engines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label search engines. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Do I Need to Adjust My SEO Every Month?

NO.

SEO Cat


Sorry. Allow me to elucidate.

I get the question all the time and not everyone likes my answer. The question generally comes from a client or potential client who heard from someone something to the effect of: "Yeah, Google's always adjusting its algorithm, so you've got to mix up that SEO every single month to keep up."


The Plan

Say you or a service provider puts together an all-inclusive, rear-kickin' SEO plan and executes it perfectly. Every page has a definitive focus, reinforced by the page title - h1 - copy Holy Relevance Trinity. Your meta data is tuned (if not always used), alt and title attribute tags are playing some killer backup and your copy is sufficient but not overkill, readable but keyword-dense.

What then?

Well, assuming the necessary submissions, robots.txt, autodiscovery are in place and nothing is done to accidentally sabotage the outcome, you've got a pretty good chance Google et.al. will begin indexing your pages or raising your rankings. After a couple weeks to a couple months, that is.


The Someone Quote

"Yeah, Google's always adjusting its algorithm, so you've got to mix up that SEO every single month to keep up."

The first problem with that general idea is the timing. Yes, you can be certain that the good folks at Google don't take one day off making tiny changes to the algorithm. But as we just mentioned, it may take a couple months to get moving. So what were you tweaking?

The second problem with the quote is the absolute arrogance it encompasses. That Someone does not know a whole lot about the algorithm, let alone the little adjustments; if they did, they would be busy on a yacht.

The last problem is necessity. If you already have a clear focus on your pages and a solid search engine optimization setup, how much can you accurately make that better by small tweaks from month to month? The answer is: you can't.


The Con(clusion)

The person who tells you that you need SEO adjustments every month either does not understand search engine optimization or is lying in order to perpetuate that myth - and perhaps even rope you into an unnecessary, expensive 12+ month SEO contract. Their gain, your loss.

In a worst-case scenario, you're looking at a never-ending game of ghost cat-and-mouse: "Sorry about the lack of any measurable results, but we're doing everything we can and Google keeps switching it up."

(Can you guess which parties do not appreciate my answer?)


A Recommendation

Search engine optimization does change, but except for the HUGE revisions (hint: they have names), the little tweaks aren't going to drastically affect your rankings, and the little tweaks that would be done to your site monthly are something a small- or medium- sized business has absolutely no need for.

After I explain this to a client, I give them a realistic recommendation: Yes, Google does change, but your focus does not, not by much. So after 90 days we'll take a look at analytics, at rankings, (at no charge) and if we see something that could increase your rankings, at THAT time we'll put together suggestions with justification into a proposal for additional SEO work.

In my professional opinion, anything else is either ignorance or deception.


(Sidenote for another post: Be wary of anyone separating web design from SEO, e.g. "And this is our SEO Package." "SEO Friendly" is what you get if you don't choose that package, which generally means "If you want it later, we'll tear out the drywall in your house to add the electric. Until then? Nothing, and we'll wait for your call.")

Thursday, January 14, 2010

MSN Tech-NO: The Microsoft-Google Synchronized FAIL Team

So if I go to Google - as I am wont to do - and were to type in, for instance, tech gadgets I get to see this:

Google MSN FAIL

Note that the #2 non-sponsored link is MSN's Tech Page. Okay, that's cool. Maybe I should check that out. *click*

Google MSN FAIL

BOO! MSN! Google! Boo!

FYI, the timed redirect goes to MSNBC's Tech page. This is an absolute SEO FAIL in a couple ways and both are to blame:
  • Google is listing at #2 a page that no longer exists.

  • Google is listing at #2 a page that has a timed redirect.

  • Microsoft did not post a 301 permanent redirect.
Boo!

For someone who is in the industry and knows what they're doing, this is saddening and disheartening. It's an obvious glitch on a prominent sample in a system that says that listing should not exist. I'm not saying I don't expect goofs and oversight every once in a while. But goofs and oversights are small. This is pretty big. And it's either saying "Google and MSN not only trip but sometimes even fall" or "If you're big enough and talk to the right people, you don't have to follow the rules."

I hope it's the former.

[sidenote: Good on Google for banging the drums against China!]

What're your thoughts?

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Reasons Bing Will not Dominate Google

Bing Logo

It looks like Bing is here to stay. For those of you that have somehow made it to this blog post without encountering Bing online or through the media blitz, Bing is Microsoft's new pet search engine - I'm sorry; they call it a decision engine. They also call it a Google Killer.

And while I have been tweaking this post for a few days now, and today a deal was sealed between Yahoo and Microsoft, I believe the argument still stands. Here are a couple reasons that Bing/Yahoo will not overrun Google.

The Raw Numbers
The last Neilsen Online numbers for search engine usage (May 2009), Google was over 63%. Yahoo and MSN/Live together were less than 27%. And while Google and Yahoo (and even AOL and Ask) total users had increased from last year, MSN dropped by almost 15%.

Familiarity
We all know Google. The simplicity of its home page is a beautiful thing and a psychological comfort to many of us. People are creatures of habit and while novelty may lead some to seek out Bing, most will go back to what they're used to.

Mystery Meat Home Page

Bing Screenshot

What the hell?

One of the reasons that Google is successful is the simplicity of it: one box, two buttons. The Bing home page is variable. There is an image of some sort littered with invisible boxes with information mildly relevant to the image. (note the one on the American Flag in the image above.)

This is mystery meat in the worst way: not only do you have to mouse over the boxes to see information that may or may not relate to the piece of the picture you are mousing over, you actually have to hunt for the boxes because they do not appear until you mouse over (or near) them.

Why is this bad? A large part of good design is abundant clarity that allows visitors to intuitively navigate to or use your page to gain the information they are looking for. Without distraction. On the contrary, Microsoft is employing design elements that are tried and true examples of worst practice.

Microsoft's MSN/Live Debacle History
First it was MSN. Then it was Live, but MSN was still there, bumming around with its hands in its pockets. Then MSN was still there but running the Live engine. And now it's calling itself Bing. Oh, MSN is still there, just running the Bing engine. And Live is still there linking you to Hotmail and Spaces (hehe, yes the MySpace wannabe is still extant).

Microsoft is already a target for being The Evil Empire. Toss in a history of confusion and failure as the basis of continuing confusion in branding and that's just untrustworthy business.


I'm guessing Bing will be around for a while - at least until MS takes a different tack. And I will work with it as a web developer because that's just good business practice. But even with this new Yahoo/Microsoft marriage of internet nobility, they are going to have a hard time getting their numbers to stabilize, let alone rise, let alone creep up on Google as a search engine.

But there's also that: Bing will always be the #1 decision engine.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

DIY: XML Sitemap Submission and Validation

Tuesday I went through the process of creating an XML sitemap and demystifying autodiscovery. Today, as promised, we will delve into getting those sitemaps into the figurative hands of the search engines.

"Hey," you might say, "but if I've created my sitemap and bolstered it with autodiscovery, can't Google find it on their own?" Of course. But since no one except Google knows their own schedule, would you prefer to rely on a blind run or say "Hey Google! Over here!"

And while I am talking about Google in generalized terms, we will be covering validation and submission with the Big 4: Google, Yahoo, Microsoft Live, and Ask.

The Setup

The basic setup for most of these is the same: you will validate that you have control over the site and submit a "feed" or sitemap. The validation process is either adding a validation meta tag to your home page or dropping a validation file in your root directory. Whether a tag or file, it's just an alphanumeric validation string so Google et. al. can prove that you own or have direct access to the site. The secondary part is telling them where your site is.

Google

You will need a Google Account for this one. Once you have that, go to http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools. Add a site. Validate your site by adding a meta tag to your home page or uploading a file to your root directory. Post the link to your sitemap. You're done!

Yahoo

You will need a Yahoo login for this one as well. Go to https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/mysites. Just like Google, you're going to validate with a file or meta tag and post your XML sitemap "feed."

Microsoft Live

Again, you'll need a Microsoft login, hotmail or the like, to get into this site. Go to http://webmaster.live.com/. Rinse and repeat: upload a file to your site for validation and list your sitemap. Blammo!

No work yet on how bing.com will handle the issue.

Ask

This one's easy. Simply put this string into your browser:

http://submissions.ask.com/ping?sitemap=http%3A//www.the URL of your sitemap here.xml

And that will ping the site to tell it your sitemap is ready for viewing and crawling.


Is sitemap submission a necessity? No, it is not; eventually the search engines will pick up on your sitemap or autodiscovery and get to crawling. But if you're a "cover all bases" and "ASAP" person like I am, go ahead and spend the half hour it takes to knock out all four of these and go to sleep a little easier.

I'm happy to take any questions or comments in, well, the comments area.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Stop Asking for First Page. Please.

This is why I get paid the big buck(s). Not because I can get you in the Top 10 (first page) of Google search engine results page (SERP), but because I educate companies away from wasting their time on foolishness and provide them with realistic expectations and real results.

(Please Note: I am not stating that getting first page on Google for search results for a specific phrase is impossible. It is not.)

I'm prompted to write this post after running into RFPs containing phrases like this all too often:

"I wanna be first on Google for all my words."

or

"I wanna own the word 'casino.'"

(note: I have found RFPs and "professional" communication in general to be rife with colloquial dialect without regard to grammar or even spelling. But that's for another post.)


Search engine optimization is not a money slot or card reader where you feed it cash or swipe your card and the more you pay, the higher your ranking. But there are many companies out there who believe that. And many other companies who hunt those companies and exploit their false beliefs and drain them of money.

One assumption some companies make is that they need to own the root word of their field. If they make and sell violin accessories, they want to rank high for violin. Do you sell violins? No? Then why would you want someone to find your site for something they are not looking for? They will subconsciously affiliate your site with the word "damn" and clicking the back button.

High ranking is not a crammed placement methodology. It starts with quality content and extends to best practices SEO, and even if you work it right and do everything the way in needs and should be done (and don't take the Black Hat path), you will never be #1 on page 1 of a Google SERP for "rice" or "casino."

Why? Wikipedia, for one. Google's supplemental content in Videos or News or Images for another. IMDB, encyclopedic entries, word definitions, and sites dedicated to those words will always be ranked highly because of the abundance of content.

SO, Mr. Naysayer, what do we do in this hopeless world of disappointment?

That's easy. You need to make sure you have appropriately abundant content on your site. Then you have to look at your site, your business, and decide exactly what it is that aligns with your goals and your target customers. What phrases - 2, 3, 4 words long - would you focus on? Should you focus on? Do any of those words or phrases have secondary or tertiary meanings? Now, does your content fully reflect those phrases?

Once you have that in order, get someone to pile on the quality SEO work that will properly optimize your site and build on that successful content.

You may not end up with any results for your core word, but the long tail could make you very popular for "commemorative casino plates."

You know, if you're into that kind of thing.


Have you bought into any gimmicks guaranteeing absurdly high placement? Is it ever legit? Have you ever dumped money into a company that talked a big game and was just collecting a check? Let me know!

And if you have any questions, feel free to contact me, Eric Marschall, at 216.288.0217.

Friday, January 30, 2009

Google Street View Goes Wrong

Because Fridays are a little more aloof...


Run, Bambi, Run!

This is one of the images captured by the Google Street View truck. The rest are not so great. Hit the link below to see the sad story unfold.

Yes, it's as bad as you think.

h/t to Peng Xiao

Friday, January 23, 2009

Nielsen Online Search Share Numbers

Last week, Nielsen Online came out with the search share numbers for December 2008 (PDF).

Guess who's on top?

% share of total searches
Google - 62.9%
Yahoo - 16.8%
Microsoft Live/MSN - 9.8%
AOL - 4.1%
Ask - 2.0%

While the number of searches overall jumped 19.6% from December '07, the only one of the top 5 above to lose out was Microsoft, dumping at -15.5% from the previous year.

I can't say I'm surprised. Ever since Microsoft slowly and cripplingly attempted a crossover from MSN to Live and dumped resources into mirrors of Google apps (that no one wanted because, hey, Google's already got an app for that), I've been watching the steady, systematic decline of what can only be looked at as: as X approaches infinity, Y approaches zero. We will never reach infinity in reality just as Microsoft will never reach zero. Because they're Microsoft.

Which provides a long, slow tail in which to enjoy Google walk away with their numbers like a thief in the night.